The fish crown or the probus scafussia?

hi all. I have a mk XV pilots watch and a port chrono and I love them both. This is my first post. After 10+ years the mk XV started to misbehave so I sent it for service via Wempe on Bond Street in London and it came back quicker that expected in great condition, full service, new crown, 拢480, no problem. Until I looked closely and saw that my original fish crown was gone, replaced by the regular Probus Scafusia one. I am told that this is standard now. Really rather annoyed as my mark XV is no longer authentic in my view. I should have been told about this before it got sent away to Schaffhausen because (even more annoyance) I can't get the original crown back even as proof of authenticity. I understand that the old crown was no longer capable of ensuring waterproofing (which ironically is what the fish was a symbol of) so why not fit a new, correct fish crown? Reason I guess is that IWC does not keep them in stock, yet elsewhere the company makes a play of saying that it keeps stock of authentic parts for discontinued models. My conclusion having read all the comment there has been over this over the years is that this change to delete the fish was done for the company's convenience, and never mind what the customers think. So disappointed and sorry that my first post had to be negative.

Ian Louden